THE GRAVE INJUSTICE AND FRAUDULENT MISCONDUCT BY UAE AUTHORITIES
AGAINST AN INDIAN INVESTOR: A CASE WARRANTING INTERNATIONAL REDRESS
The case of Mr. Jabir, a lawful investor and long-term UAE resident, has now emerged as a defining scandal in state-sanctioned judicial sabotage, involving grave human rights violations. Despite multiple binding rulings by the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi in favour of him, enforcement has been willfully obstructed. Instead, Mr. Jabir was illegally deported under a forged order that falsely depicted him as a convicted criminal. The accused: "Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan—current President of the UAE and Ruler of Abu Dhabi—faces documented claims of armed robbery, torture, attempted murder, and embezzlement, perpetrated with the involvement of Abu Dhabi Police."
Forged court orders were used to forcibly dispossess the investor, in direct violation of domestic and international law. These documents forged a story, painstakingly typed and circulated through immigration, police databases, legal systems, and blacklists, creating a false criminal history, further polishing its crime-free facade. It killed his credibility, buried court verdicts, and ensured his permanent ban from the country—not even to seek justice. These developments suggest a deliberate state cover-up—an attempt to erase a landmark court ruling that implicated the very institutions they led. And in doing so, they did not merely exile a man—they exiled justice itself.
The decision to deport Mr. Jabir was not taken in ignorance. It was an act of political preservation, executed by men in power with direct involvement in the case. The forgery of state record was deliberate, traceable to top leadership figures, including Sheikh Mohamed Bin Zayed, then head of the State Security Apparatus. The deportation paved the way for a staggering state-backed heist. His companies, valued at over $100 million, was dismantled with surgical precision. Over 800 real estate properties linked to the UAE’s elite, including residential towers, showrooms, warehouses, and industrial complexes were seized, their inventories looted, and corporate records erased through systemic fraud.
Mr. Jabir possessed what few victims of injustice can claim: documented proof, binding judgments, and judicial orders in his favour, including a 1996 Apex Court ruling and the fraudulent deportation order. This case remains an open wound on the credibility of the UAE’s governing regime, its legal system, and its stated international obligations. So long as the forged records remain concealed, the perpetrators remain unpunished, and the court’s judgment remains nullified by fraud, this case stands as a lasting indictment of a state that transformed its justice system into a weapon of repression. ... " INSIDE THE UN PETITION ROCKING THE UAE: EXPOSED VERDICTS, FORGED DOCUMENTS, AND A BILLION-DOLLAR CONSPIRACY" 
.
CHASE THE TRAILS OF THE UAE FUGITIVE, 25 YEARS ON THE RUN FOR JUSTICE: This case concerns a prolonged and racially motivated abuse of legal process orchestrated at the highest levels of the United Arab Emirates’ administration. It began with a court decree. In 1995, an Indian-origin investor legally secured a lease-build contract on a high-value Abu Dhabi property. But instead of honoring the judgment, the UAE state turned predator. What followed was not just a legal cover-up—it was a full-scale, state-orchestrated assault on law and liberty.
Acting under the direction of Abu Dhabi’s de facto ruler, with the complicity of police and intelligence forces, the investor was subjected to a brutal campaign: armed robbery, kidnapping, brutal torture, arbitrary detention, and forged documentation, followed by illegal deportation. Every legal avenue was sabotaged. Even as four UAE court rulings and two Indian judgments upheld the investor’s claim, the UAE regime looted over $100 million in assets. Twenty-five years later, the court orders remain unenforced. The crime scene is not just a courtroom, it’s an entire system built to silence justice.
STATEMENT ON THE OCCASION OF THE 25TH YEAR OF GANG-ROBBERY, KIDNAPPING AND BRUTAL TORTURE BY ABU DHABI POLICE! ... " Chase The Trails Of 25-Year ‘UAE Fugitive" .
WHEN COURTS DECIDE TO COPY HOMEWORK FROM CORRUPT POLICE FILES!
In recent cases, successive judges, yes, even some from the State of Kerala, have chosen to uphold findings that their very own judicial peers had previously set aside. This constitutes not only a breach of legal due diligence but also an erosion of public trust in judicial neutrality. Citizens continue to suffer legal injustice because the courts either ignored or deliberately chose not to engage with material evidence on record. These judgments, if anything, read like bad school essays. The kind where the student didn't read the book but tried to fake it with copy-pasted nonsense. The only difference? These "students" are wearing judicial robes and signing off on people’s futures. ... Judicial Misconduct Must Not Hide Behind Robes []
OPEN LETTER TO THE UAE ADMINISTRATION
The execution of a judicial judgment is a cornerstone of the fundamental human right to a fair trial within a reasonable timeframe, as enshrined in international legal standards. Regrettably, this right has been infringed. The judgment-debtor, identified as the UAE ruler, has circumvented legal obligations in a manner that constitutes a deliberate and egregious act of fraud against the judgment-creditor, Mr. Jabir. This misconduct has deprived him of the benefits of his lawfully obtained decrees, compelled him to abandon his established business concerns, real estate holdings, and other investments in the UAE, and caused irreparable harm to his reputation. ... Letter to the H.E. Dr. Ahmed Al Banna, UAE Ambassador to India []
DENIAL OF JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT AS A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION: THE CASE OF JABIR v. UAE
An extensive archive of correspondence—hundreds of letters—documenting the Judgment Creditor’s tireless appeals to Indian politicians and diplomats, who responded with inaction and duplicity". ... For further details, refer to Case Exhibits: []
